Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Loevy + Loevy announced that The Intercept and CIR had filed an opening brief in the Southern District of New York and stated their opposition to unauthorized use of journalistic material.
What changed
Loevy + Loevy announced that The Intercept and CIR had filed an opening brief in the Southern District of New York and stated their opposition to unauthorized use of journalistic material.
Based on counsel’s announcement; the full brief has not been checked, and its allegations are not described as court-approved. Microsoft’s involvement in consolidated litigation does not automatically establish reinstatement of this case’s dismissed claims.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: news publishing disputes over attribution and copyright management information offer institutional comparisons for ownership of creative materials; they cannot substitute for a history of artists’ actions.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
Loevy + Loevy announced that The Intercept and CIR had filed an opening brief in the Southern District of New York and stated their opposition to unauthorized use of journalistic material.
SRC-0151Lines 59–76: counsel’s announcement of that day’s opening brief, MDL context, and future briefing dates.
Loevy + Loevy · EN · 2026-09-04
Case
Related documents
DOC-0139Digital Publishers The Intercept and CIR file brief in OpenAI litigationCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Counsel announces filing of a new brief.” evt-0161. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.