The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Source metadata and links checked; this does not mean the original was saved.
View full image ↗Source-page excerpt from “Digital Publishers The Intercept and CIR file brief in OpenAI litigation”, captured on 1 October 2026. The original-language layout is retained; this is not a snapshot taken on the event date.
Source: Loevy + Loevy; rights remain with the original holders.
Source · Digital Publishers The Intercept and CIR file brief in OpenAI litigation ↗Material description
Plaintiffs’ counsel announcement; the full brief and sealed evidence were not checked. The article discusses different publishers together; it does not establish restoration of Microsoft-related claims dismissed in 2025.
This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.
Sources & original material
Loevy + Loevy · EN · 2026-09-04
Related events
Counsel announces filing of a new brief
Loevy + Loevy announced that The Intercept and CIR had filed an opening brief in the Southern District of New York and stated their opposition to unauthorised use of journalistic material.
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Digital Publishers The Intercept and CIR file brief in OpenAI litigation.” doc-0139. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.