The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Authors Guild’s announcement the following day says it and co-plaintiffs filed summary-judgment motions and supporting briefs on September 4 in MDL 25-md-3143.
View full image ↗Opening page of the source document associated with “Authors Guild and Co-Plaintiffs File Motion for Summary Judgment v. OpenAI and Microsoft”. Original page layout retained; follow the source for the full text.
Image source: Authors Guild; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · Authors Guild and Co-Plaintiffs File Motion for Summary Judgment v. OpenAI and Microsoft ↗What changed
Plaintiffs ask the court to decide copyright and fair-use issues. This is a procedural development.
The original motions and defence briefs had not yet been read for this entry. A request is not a judgment already issued by the court.
Editorial research question
Editorial research question: plaintiffs ask the court to decide copyright and fair-use issues. This is a procedural development.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
Authors Guild’s announcement the following day says it and co-plaintiffs filed summary-judgment motions and supporting briefs on September 4 in MDL 25-md-3143.
SRC-0022Opening reference to the 2026-09-04 motions and MDL number; closing schedule for further briefs
Authors Guild · EN · 2026-09-05
Case
Related documents
DOC-0011Authors Guild and Co-Plaintiffs File Motion for Summary Judgment v. OpenAI and MicrosoftCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Authors Guild and others file summary-judgment motions against OpenAI and Microsoft, according to plaintiffs.” evt-0024. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.