The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Collected events and documents are linked in the timeline; the case history remains under research.
View full image ↗Opening page of the source document associated with “Authors Guild and Co-Plaintiffs File Motion for Summary Judgment v. OpenAI and Microsoft”. Original page layout retained; follow the source for the full text.
Image source: Authors Guild; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · Authors Guild and Co-Plaintiffs File Motion for Summary Judgment v. OpenAI and Microsoft ↗The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
Authors Guild announces a lawsuit with novelists
Authors Guild announces that it and 17 authors are suing OpenAI, alleging unauthorised use of novels to train models.
Authors Guild and others file summary-judgment motions against OpenAI and Microsoft, according to plaintiffs
Authors Guild’s announcement the following day says it and co-plaintiffs filed summary-judgment motions and supporting briefs on September 4 in MDL 25-md-3143.
Research question
Retains actors’ positions and specific historical materials for comparison across cases.
Related documents
DOC-0011Authors Guild and Co-Plaintiffs File Motion for Summary Judgment v. OpenAI and MicrosoftDOC-0511Unsealed Files Show Open AI/Microsoft Knew Copying Was Illegal and Could Hurt AuthorsSources
Authors Guild · EN · 2023-09-20
Authors Guild · EN · 2026-09-05
Publishers Weekly · EN · 2026-09-21
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Authors Guild / OpenAI literary-works litigation.” case-0005. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.