The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Source metadata and links checked; this does not mean the original was saved.
View full image ↗Opening page of the source document associated with “Warner Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss — Document 52”. Original page layout retained; follow the source for the full text.
Image source: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; copy hosted by Music Business Worldwide; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · Warner Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss — Document 52 ↗Material description
Document 52 was filed on 11 September, distinct from later reporting. First five pages checked; no claim that the court dismissed the case or musicians waived all rights.
This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.
Sources & original material
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; copy hosted by Music Business Worldwide · EN · 2026-09-11
Related events
Warner and Atlantic file reply in AFM dismissal proceedings
Warner and Atlantic argue that existing recording terms do not supply additional AI-use rates and urge reliance on collective bargaining; AFM maintains that the contract permits competing reasonable interpretations.
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Warner Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss — Document 52.” doc-0427. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.