Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; copy hosted by Music Business Worldwide
Read original source (EN)https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/files/2026/09/Warner-Reply-AFM.pdf
Reading location
PDF pp.1–5.
Document 52 was filed on 11 September, distinct from later reporting. First five pages checked; no claim that the court dismissed the case or musicians waived all rights.
Capture status
No verified capture is recorded. The original page may change; an access date is not a historical version date.
Events citing this source
Warner and Atlantic file reply in AFM dismissal proceedings
Warner and Atlantic argue that existing recording terms do not supply additional AI-use rates and urge reliance on collective bargaining; AFM maintains that the contract permits competing reasonable interpretations.
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Warner Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss — Document 52.” src-0436. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.