The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Source metadata and links checked; this does not mean the original was saved.
View full image ↗Source-page excerpt from “Opinion: IMDA Must Uphold Authors’ and Publishers’ Intellectual Property Rights”, captured on 1 October 2026. The original-language layout is retained; this is not a snapshot taken on the event date.
Source: Singapore Unbound; rights remain with the original holders.
Source · Opinion: IMDA Must Uphold Authors’ and Publishers’ Intellectual Property Rights ↗Material description
Editorial by the board of a New York-based transnational literary organisation, not a joint statement of all Singapore authors. Jee Koh appears in the page author field; the body is collectively signed Editorial Board. Legal assessments and criticism of the survey are authors’ positions; original survey unchecked.
This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.
Sources & original material
Singapore Unbound · EN · 2024-04-08
Related events
Singapore Unbound editorial board presents six literary-training safeguards to IMDA
The editorial questioned rights safeguards, remuneration commitments, and consultation scope in IMDA’s literary-material survey. It called for explicit compliance with copyright and contracts, dialogue, funded independent advice, an advisory mechanism, and disclosed fair remuneration and opt-out arrangements.
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Opinion: IMDA Must Uphold Authors’ and Publishers’ Intellectual Property Rights.” doc-0171. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.