ANTI-AI ARCHIVESALON DES REFUSÉS
DOCUMENTS / DOC-0171

Opinion: IMDA Must Uphold Authors’ and Publishers’ Intellectual Property Rights

Original title: Opinion: IMDA Must Uphold Authors’ and Publishers’ Intellectual Property Rights

Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

Source metadata and links checked; this does not mean the original was saved.

Catalogue record & links

Material description

Editorial by the board of a New York-based transnational literary organization, not a joint statement of all Singapore authors. Jee Koh appears in the page author field; the body is collectively signed Editorial Board. Legal assessments and criticism of the survey are authors’ positions; original survey unchecked.

RESEARCH NOTE

This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.

Sources & original material

Related events

Singapore Unbound editorial board presents six literary-training safeguards to IMDA

The editorial questioned rights safeguards, remuneration commitments, and consultation scope in IMDA’s literary-material survey. It called for explicit compliance with copyright and contracts, dialogue, funded independent advice, an advisory mechanism, and disclosed fair remuneration and opt-out arrangements.

Singapore / United StatesLiterature / PublishingEVT-0189

Related cases

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Opinion: IMDA Must Uphold Authors’ and Publishers’ Intellectual Property Rights.” doc-0171. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.