Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Singapore Unbound
Read original source (EN)https://singaporeunbound.org/oped/imda-intellectual-property-rights
Reading location
Lines 11–44: survey context, six demands, editorial board signature and statement of independent views, and date.
Editorial by the board of a New York-based transnational literary organization, not a joint statement of all Singapore authors. Jee Koh appears in the page author field; the body is collectively signed Editorial Board. Legal assessments and criticism of the survey are authors’ positions; original survey unchecked.
Capture status
No verified capture is recorded. The original page may change; an access date is not a historical version date.
Events citing this source
Singapore Unbound editorial board presents six literary-training safeguards to IMDA
The editorial questioned rights safeguards, remuneration commitments, and consultation scope in IMDA’s literary-material survey. It called for explicit compliance with copyright and contracts, dialogue, funded independent advice, an advisory mechanism, and disclosed fair remuneration and opt-out arrangements.
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Opinion: IMDA Must Uphold Authors’ and Publishers’ Intellectual Property Rights.” src-0183. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.