Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Source metadata and links checked; this does not mean the original was saved.
Material description
Defendant’s brief, not a court opinion. Argument headings and requests checked, not all reasoning and evidence. Public redactions do not allow inference about sealed contents.
This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.
Sources & original material
OpenAI defendants · EN · 2026-09-04
Related events
OpenAI files brief supporting summary judgment
OpenAI filed a publicly redacted brief arguing that pretraining and browsing uses were protected by fair use and other defenses, asking the court to grant its motion.
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “OpenAI memorandum supporting summary judgment, NYT ECF 1496.” doc-0142. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.