ANTI-AI ARCHIVE
SOURCES / SRC-0154

OpenAI memorandum supporting summary judgment, NYT ECF 1496

The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

OpenAI defendants

Read original source (EN)

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.612697/gov.uscourts.nysd.612697.1496.0.pdf

Reading location

PDF cover, contents, and pages 31–33: conclusion, signature, and filing date; publicly redacted version.

RESEARCH NOTE

Defendant’s brief, not a court opinion. Argument headings and requests checked, not all reasoning and evidence. Public redactions do not allow inference about sealed contents.

Capture status

No verified capture is recorded. The original page may change; an access date is not a historical version date.

Events citing this source

OpenAI files brief supporting summary judgment

OpenAI filed a publicly redacted brief arguing that pretraining and browsing uses were protected by fair use and other defences, asking the court to grant its motion.

United StatesNews publishing / PublishingEVT-0164

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “OpenAI memorandum supporting summary judgment, NYT ECF 1496.” src-0154. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.