ANTI-AI ARCHIVE
CASES / CASE-0339

Literary AI, translation labour and book interaction

The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

The Auteursbond interview presents Sicking on training transparency, Kieft on governance/hybrid writing, Koper on translation rework, and Ruys on book-question chat distinct from authorship.

Dates describe collected records, not the full life of the case.
RESEARCH NOTE

Publication date, not interview/launch. Edited positions, not recordings, consensus or technical/environmental tests. Demands not findings; book chat/author satisfaction are publisher claims, contracts, model/corpus, outputs and use unverified. Publisher lacks good usage data. Historical 2017 technology labels, litigation/examples unverified;2020 novel contextual.7 March symposium is announcement only.

Case chronology

Dutch authors, translator and publisher discuss AI

The Auteursbond interview presents Sicking on training transparency, Kieft on governance/hybrid writing, Koper on translation rework, and Ruys on book-question chat distinct from authorship.

NetherlandsLiterature / PublishingEVT-0560

Research question

Editorial significance: training control, translation labour and book-interaction experiments coexist in an association forum, documenting negotiation rather than uniform rejection.

Related documents

DOC-1643Dutch authors, translator and publisher discuss AI

Sources

SRC-1717

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Literary AI, translation labour and book interaction.” case-0339. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.