Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.
The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
Beijing Internet Court hears four illustrators’ cases against AI drawing software online
The Beijing Internet Court held online hearings in four illustrators’ cases against developers and operators of AI drawing software. Plaintiffs alleged unauthorized training and generation services infringed their rights and sought cessation and removal of related learning results. Developers and operators raised defenses including fair use and absence of substantial similarity; the platform denied supplying works or participating in the disputed conduct.
Research question
Illustrators bring training, generation services, and labor effects of style substitution before courts; defendants’ fair-use, substantial-similarity, and participation defenses are retained.
Related documents
DOC-0202Reported first Chinese copyright-infringement case concerning AI drawing-model training reaches hearingDOC-0203Is training a large model on illustrators’ works without permission lawful? Reported first national case reaches hearingSources
Beijing Internet Court WeChat account / Republication by The Paper · ZH · 2024-06-20
Southern Metropolis Daily Privacy Protection Team / Sohu · ZH · 2024-06-21
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Trik AI / Four illustrators sue drawing-model developers and operators over alleged training infringement.” case-0129. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.
