Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Danske Forlag / Dansk Oversætterforbund / Dansk Forfatterforening
Read original source (DA)https://danskforfatterforening.dk/dof/wp-content/uploads/sites/80/2025/04/Anbefaling-om-kreditering-ifm.-maskinoversaettelse-og-biblioteksafgift.pdf
Reading location
Full one-page text, lines 0–28, dated April 2025.
Joint recommendations distinguish machine-translation post-editing credit from translator credit. The authority's guidance is quoted by this document and was not independently read at that stage; not new law. Individual books and repayment cases unverified. Batch 143 separately checked the authority's current page, src-0360; historical addition date remains unknown.
Capture status
No verified capture is recorded. The original page may change; an access date is not a historical version date.
Events citing this source
Three Danish organisations announce joint recommendations on crediting machine-translation post-editing
Three organisations recommend crediting post-editing as editorial work, distinguishing it from literary translation in connection with library remuneration.
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Entitlement to public lending remuneration when AI is used in translation.” src-0359. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.