Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
NAFCA
Read original source (JA)https://nafca.jp/public-comment01/
Reading location
Lines 35–111: dates, statement, opt-out rights, voice interests, remuneration and archive use; HTML datePublished and dateModified.
Public metadata: published 2023-11-07, modified 2025-09-08. Changes were not compared, so current text is not called an original snapshot. Publication of a consultation-response statement does not establish government adoption. Formal submission date and receipt were not checked; legal interpretations are NAFCA's position.
Capture status
No verified capture is recorded. The original page may change; an access date is not a historical version date.
Events citing this source
NAFCA publishes its opinion on intellectual property in the AI era
NAFCA published its response to a Cabinet Office consultation, advocating training opt-out rights and voice protection, distinguishing remuneration after consent from the right to refuse training, and proposing that digital archives first serve human learning and transmission of skills.
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Opinion on intellectual property rights in the AI era.” src-0315. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.