The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Organiser employees’ IPSJ article recounts shared judging, human revision/disclosure and entry limits; retained11th-edition rules confirm clauses, not the initial effective date.
What changed
Organiser employees’ IPSJ article recounts shared judging, human revision/disclosure and entry limits; retained11th-edition rules confirm clauses, not the initial effective date.
Awarded story unread. Official author comment reports101/100 versus March account100/99; both retained. Judge Oki labels a passage AI-written, while the method account identifies it as human input; reception is not an authorship audit. Retrospective publication is not rule adoption; awarded text/individual enforcement unchecked.
Editorial research question
Editorial: prize reception and distinctions between generation and human editing enter a literary award’s evaluation and process rules, documenting institutional negotiation over hybrid authorship.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
Notice and participant evidence
SRC-1598Full article1–70,including rule retrospective/references/bylines;linked works not read
Notice and participant evidence
SRC-1599Selected dated topics104–117 and full submission rules/AI clauses/notice of change, not all bios or site
Information Processing Society of Japan — IPSJ Magazine · JA · 2024-06-18
Case
Related documents
DOC-1524The Nikkei Hoshi Award and generative AIDOC-1525Eleventh-edition submission rulesCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Organiser publishes AI-submission retrospective.” evt-0525. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.