ANTI-AI ARCHIVE
EVENTS / EVT-0487

DNDA refuses TOCIX registration

The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

Refuses TOCIX application1-2023-88060 filed7 September2023, inferring insufficient concrete human creative intervention from its AI-production description. DNDA administrative decision, not final court judgment or new legislation. Notice/review/appeal route stated, actual notice, challenge and finality unverified.

Sources read · Research in progress

What changed

Registry issues administrative refusal of this application with notice and review provisions.

RESEARCH NOTE

The application was filed on 7 September 2023 and the decision issued on 1 December; May 2024 is only the current file path. The initial review did not cover pages 4–8 and did not claim a complete reading. The submitted image, model and prompts remain unexamined; notice, remedies and finality are unresolved. On 17 October 2026, batch 808 rendered and read the remaining printed pages 4–8. Together with batch 807, this covers 11 substantive pages; physical page 12 is blank. Page 4 describes registration as declaratory and evidentiary rather than constitutive of rights; page 5 limits the registration function; pages 6–8 discuss human original expression and distinguish software tools from AI generation of specific expression. These are the authority’s 2023 reasons. Cited laws and cases were not separately obtained, and current law was not comprehensively checked. Page 4 records a digital-art classification and JPG attachment; the archive has not thereby obtained the artwork. Two Spanish-language searches retrieved no original notice, review or appeal record; this does not establish absence of a challenge or finality.

Editorial research question

Editorial: concrete Latin American administrative evidence on human creative contribution in visual-art registration; application, authority inference and actual review outcomes remain distinct.

This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.

Evidence & sources

01

Date, application and refusal; review route.

SRC-1312

Printedpp1,3,9–11 visually read

02

Authority distinguishes evidentiary registration, human expression and tool/AI roles.

SRC-1312

Printedpp4–8 visually read in batch808

SRC-1312
Administrative registration refusal

Dirección Nacional de Derecho de Autor (DNDA), Colombia · ES · 2023-12-01

Case

Related documents

DOC-1239Administrative registration refusal

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “DNDA refuses TOCIX registration.” evt-0487. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.