The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Seemel’s 2023 transcript emphasises human artistic experience and remuneration while allowing playful generator use and declining dataset opt-out.
View full image ↗Image published with “Why Human Art Will Always Be More Interesting to Us Than AI Images”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.
Image source: Gwenn Seemel; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · Why Human Art Will Always Be More Interesting to Us Than AI Images ↗What changed
Seemel’s 2023 transcript emphasises human artistic experience and remuneration while allowing playful generator use and declining dataset opt-out.
Artist-published transcript read, video not watched; search and trial accounts not independently verified. Preserve 2023 openness to playful use alongside 2025 refusal rather than projecting refusal backward.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: Changing positions document a non-linear individual history of refusal.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
Seemel’s 2023 transcript emphasises human artistic experience and remuneration while allowing playful generator use and declining dataset opt-out.
SRC-0471Dateline 12, transcript 54–82
Gwenn Seemel · EN · 2023-01-01
Gwenn Seemel · FR · 2023-01-01
Case
Related documents
DOC-0462Why Human Art Will Always Be More Interesting to Us Than AI ImagesDOC-0463Why human art will always be more interesting to us than AI-generated imagesCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Seemel on human art and AI images.” evt-0383. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.