The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
The newspapers allege unlicensed copying for datasets, training and outputs, seeking damages, injunctions and impoundment or destruction of models and datasets incorporating their works.
View full image ↗Opening page of the source document associated with “The Seattle Times Company and Newsday LLC v OpenAI et al. — Complaint”. Original page layout retained; follow the source for the full text.
Image source: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; RECAP copy; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · The Seattle Times Company and Newsday LLC v OpenAI et al. — Complaint ↗What changed
The newspapers allege unlicensed copying for datasets, training and outputs, seeking damages, injunctions and impoundment or destruction of models and datasets incorporating their works.
Case 1:26-cv-07644, Document 1. First four pages, relief and dated signature checked. Requested destruction is not an issued order.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: examines relationships between creative labour, permission and institutional responses in this record.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
The newspapers allege unlicensed copying for datasets, training and outputs, seeking damages, injunctions and impoundment or destruction of models and datasets incorporating their works.
SRC-0440PDF pp.1–4 and 37–38.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; RECAP copy · EN · 2026-09-04
Case
Related documents
DOC-0431The Seattle Times Company and Newsday LLC v OpenAI et al. — ComplaintCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Seattle Times and Newsday file news-copyright complaint.” evt-0370. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.