Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
The majority finds the AI content harassing and orders removal, recommending broader manipulated-imagery rules covering fabricated actions and words, better report prioritisation and removal of matching violations.
What changed
The majority finds the AI content harassing and orders removal, recommending broader manipulated-imagery rules covering fabricated actions and words, better report prioritisation and removal of matching violations.
A minority disagreed that existing harassment rules were met. Recommendations do not establish that Meta has changed policy or implemented them.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: examines relationships between creative labour, permission and institutional responses in this record.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
The majority finds the AI content harassing and orders removal, recommending broader manipulated-imagery rules covering fabricated actions and words, better report prioritisation and removal of matching violations.
SRC-0431Announcement lines 25–40.
Oversight Board · EN · 2026-09-17
Case
Related documents
DOC-0422Strengthen Bullying and Harassment Policies Against AI Imagery of People Not in Public EyeCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Oversight Board calls for broader protection against AI harassment of private individuals.” evt-0361. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.