Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
The report describes a coalition of sound designers, recordists, mixers and libraries opposing unlicensed commercial-AI scraping and unlicensed media use, while advocating licensing.
What changed
The report describes a coalition of sound designers, recordists, mixers and libraries opposing unlicensed commercial-AI scraping and unlicensed media use, while advocating licensing.
Records publication date. The body's 24 September launch date conflicts with its 18 September dateline; formal launch awaits primary confirmation. Opposition to unlicensed training is not rejection of all AI training.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: examines relationships between creative labour, permission and institutional responses in this record.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
The report describes a coalition of sound designers, recordists, mixers and libraries opposing unlicensed commercial-AI scraping and unlicensed media use, while advocating licensing.
SRC-0427Article lines 22–64, including conflicting dates.
Music Business Worldwide · EN · 2026-09-18
Case
Related documents
DOC-0418Sound designers and SFX libraries launch Professional Sound Alliance to fight AI scraping: Now sound will have protection of our ownCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Report on Professional Sound Alliance opposing unlicensed scraping and sound use.” evt-0357. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.