Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
On a prima facie assessment, the court restrains unauthorised uses of the performer's name, voice, likeness and other identity attributes and orders action on listed impersonation content, allowing further disputes to return to court.
What changed
On a prima facie assessment, the court restrains unauthorised uses of the performer's name, voice, likeness and other identity attributes and orders action on listed impersonation content, allowing further disputes to return to court.
Ad-interim relief, not a final merits judgment or universal ban on imitation. Enforcement and subsequent orders not checked.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: examines relationships between creative labour, permission and institutional responses in this record.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
On a prima facie assessment, the court restrains unauthorised uses of the performer's name, voice, likeness and other identity attributes and orders action on listed impersonation content, allowing further disputes to return to court.
SRC-0426Order date and paragraphs 12–21.
Bombay High Court; text reproduced by Indian Kanoon · EN · 2026-09-03
Case
Related documents
DOC-0417Shruti Haasan vs Mahalaxmi Arts And Craft Works on 3 September, 2026Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Bombay High Court grants Shruti Haasan ad-interim personality-rights relief.” evt-0356. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.