The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
ADA reports its AI/copyright discussion and supports training-consent, licensing and disclosure proposals, while distinguishing opportunistic use from use under livelihood pressure and rejecting blanket demonisation.
View full image ↗Image published with “AI and authors' rights”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.
Image source: ADA; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · AI and authors' rights ↗What changed
ADA reports its AI/copyright discussion and supports training-consent, licensing and disclosure proposals, while distinguishing opportunistic use from use under livelihood pressure and rejecting blanket demonisation.
12 May2023 is the webpage publication date; the talk is reported as26 April. Embedded videos were not viewed. Association reporting is not verbatim speech or a shared position of all participants; infringement and job-loss claims remain attributed and proposals are not legislation.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: Compare training consent, labour pressure and association display rules.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
ADA reports its AI/copyright discussion and supports training-consent, licensing and disclosure proposals, while distinguishing opportunistic use from use under livelihood pressure and rejecting blanket demonisation.
SRC-0411Article body lines 45–101 read; not embedded videos.
Case
Related documents
DOC-0402AI and authors' rightsCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “ADA publishes AI-copyright discussion and proposals.” evt-0341. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.