Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Akram’s 2023-dated collection presents varied literary responses to AI; Onyekachi’s poem stages pressure to adapt through its narrator’s accounts of displaced craft and writing.
What changed
Akram’s 2023-dated collection presents varied literary responses to AI; Onyekachi’s poem stages pressure to adapt through its narrator’s accounts of displaced craft and writing.
Read copyright, contents, editorial note (printed p.1) and AI: Abstract I (pp.3–4) in the 70-page PDF, not the whole volume. Copyright year 2023 supplies year precision, not a September release date inferred from the URL. A 77-page version differs in title and editorial text; version order is unverified and its download was truncated, so it was not substituted for the same file. The poetic narrator is not evidence of the author's employment history. Further reading: the image-tools essay is author testimony and criticism, not an independent archive experiment. Prompts were not rerun; model versions, samples and images were not independently checked. Output-rights claims are not legal findings. The essay text at printed pp.40–44 was read in full, not the entire book. Mbobo's signed commentary at printed pp.23–27 (PDF pp.26–30) was also read in full. It is not a collective declaration or technical test; claims about consciousness, architecture, hands and modality limits remain the author's 2023 views, not findings about current capabilities. The image-tools essay was additionally checked on 16 September 2026 at 18:00, and Mbobo's essay on 17 September.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: Editorial comparison centres literary works alongside institutional policies and preserves divergent positions.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
Akram’s 2023-dated collection presents varied literary responses to AI; Onyekachi’s poem stages pressure to adapt through its narrator’s accounts of displaced craft and writing.
SRC-040970-page PDF: copyright p.2; contents p.3; editorial note p.4 (printed 1); poem pp.6–7 (printed 3–4); web text lines 1–124.
Drawing on her own Leonardo AI illustration practice, Okeke criticises associations between poverty prompts and darker skin, and positive prompts and white figures, calling for more inclusive representation.
SRC-0409Printed pp.40–44, PDF pages 43–47, web text 1238–1316. Text only.
Mbobo argues for the distinctiveness of human creativity through lived experience, emotion and intention, and criticises style imitation and reproduced bias.
SRC-0409Printed pp.23–27, PDF pp.26–30, web text 710–907.
Case
Related documents
DOC-0397Binary Bisecting: An AI AnthologyDOC-0398AI: Abstract IDOC-0399Are AI Image Tools Racist?DOC-0400Artificial Intelligence VS Human CreativityCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “2023-dated anthology: AI doubts and adaptation.” evt-0340. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.