ANTI-AI ARCHIVESALON DES REFUSÉS
EVENTS / EVT-0330

FSE–IAWG joint position

Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

The organisations advocate human authorship, disclosure, training consent and fair payment, pursuing contracts and policy.

Sources read · Research in progress

What changed

The organisations advocate human authorship, disclosure, training consent and fair payment, pursuing contracts and policy.

RESEARCH NOTE

Release date corroborated by the dated original and member page; demands are not current law or a blanket tool ban.

Editorial research question

Editorial interpretation: How transnational advocacy enters local contracts and labour demands requires separate regional evidence.

This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.

Evidence & sources

01

The organisations advocate human authorship, disclosure, training consent and fair payment, pursuing contracts and policy.

SRC-0396

Two-page release, lines 1–48; full text read.

02

Material relevant to this case; see the locator for the precise scope read.

SRC-0397

Article lines 117–137; full text read.

SRC-0397
WGGB joins sister guilds across the globe in calling for ethical use of AI

Writers’ Guild of Great Britain · EN · 2024-04-11

Case

Related documents

DOC-0384Artificial Intelligence: Global Screenwriters Call for Ethical UseDOC-0385WGGB joins sister guilds across the globe in calling for ethical use of AI

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “FSE–IAWG joint position.” evt-0330. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.