Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Contemporary reporting dates the group’s statement to June 14; its website explains using AI alongside other musical tools.
What changed
Contemporary reporting dates the group’s statement to June 14; its website explains using AI alongside other musical tools.
Date follows press coverage; official page has no independent dateline. Only part was initially read; original audience objections remain unverified. This is not an anti-AI organisation. This round checked four concluding statements and labour passages. The group's denial of reducing employment is self-reported; the current page incorporates later developments and is not an original snapshot.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: records artists defending AI practice alongside audience objections, preserving disagreement within the arts.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
Contemporary reporting dates the group’s statement to June 14; its website explains using AI alongside other musical tools.
SRC-0356Official website lines 149–173: opening of AI position; lines 16–25: group introduction. Full long-form statement not read.
Material relevant to this case; see the locator for the precise scope read.
SRC-0357Full article, lines 16–51; statement date at line 26 and controversy at line 49.
SHIN-ON-GAK · JA · Date unknown
ITmedia AI＋ · JA · 2025-06-19
Case
Related documents
DOC-0344SHIN-ON-GAK About Us — Statement on using AI for music productionDOC-0345Soundtrack creators for Thus Spoke Rohan Kishibe issue an AI-use statement: over 16,000 characters explaining why they use AICite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “SHIN-ON-GAK responds to the AI soundtrack controversy.” evt-0307. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.