Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
FREELENS proposed distinctions between authentic photographs, modified photographs, and generated images, using A/M/G labels and preserved metadata, and required permission and fair remuneration for training uses of works.
What changed
FREELENS proposed distinctions between authentic photographs, modified photographs, and generated images, using A/M/G labels and preserved metadata, and required permission and fair remuneration for training uses of works.
Date is the original document’s stated date, not a law’s effective date or proof of implementation. Organizational views and allegations have not been independently verified.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: records specific demands of a German professional photography organization concerning creative rights, image authenticity, and technology governance, retaining organizations’ separate positions.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
FREELENS proposed distinctions between authentic photographs, modified photographs, and generated images, using A/M/G labels and preserved metadata, and required permission and fair remuneration for training uses of works.
SRC-0160PDF text pages 1–3: page 1 dated Hamburg 03/2023 and A/M/G labels; page 2 training-permission and remuneration demands; page 3 organizational introduction.
FREELENS · DE · Date unknown
Case
Related documents
DOC-0148FREELENS position paper on image generation through artificial intelligenceCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “FREELENS position paper distinguishes authentic photographs, modified photographs, and generated images.” evt-0170. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.