Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
The court dismissed all claims against Microsoft and the §1202(b)(3) claim against OpenAI, while allowing the §1202(b)(1) claim against OpenAI to proceed.
What changed
The court dismissed all claims against Microsoft and the §1202(b)(3) claim against OpenAI, while allowing the §1202(b)(1) claim against OpenAI to proceed.
ECF 122 reconstructed from the 2025 opinion. Those dismissals were with prejudice; permission to proceed is not a merits victory.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: news publishing disputes over attribution and copyright management information offer institutional comparisons for ownership of creative materials; they cannot substitute for a history of artists’ actions.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
The court dismissed all claims against Microsoft and the §1202(b)(3) claim against OpenAI, while allowing the §1202(b)(1) claim against OpenAI to proceed.
SRC-0150Opening and Procedural Background: February 28, 2024 filing and November 21, 2024 order; IV Conclusion and February 20, 2025 date.
U.S. District Court, S.D. New York · EN · 2025-02-20
Case
Related documents
DOC-0138The Intercept Media v. OpenAI, 24-cv-1515: Opinion and OrderCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Court dismisses some claims and allows one to proceed.” evt-0159. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.