Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
The court dismissed the second cause of action concerning false copyright management information with leave to amend; the other claims challenged by this motion continued.
What changed
The court dismissed the second cause of action concerning false copyright management information with leave to amend; the other claims challenged by this motion continued.
The amendment deadline was May 7; whether an amendment was filed remains to be checked. The first copyright cause of action was outside this motion’s scope. This is not a ruling that training was lawful or infringing.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: distinguishes training materials, output watermarks, and different causes of action, while recording changes in litigation venue.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
The court dismissed the second cause of action concerning false copyright management information with leave to amend; the other claims challenged by this motion continued.
SRC-0141Pages 1–3: procedure and motion scope; pages 9–10: conclusion, amendment deadline, and signature date.
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · EN · 2026-04-23
Case
Related documents
DOC-0129Getty v. Stability, 25-cv-06891-TLT, ECF 53Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “California court partly grants and partly denies dismissal motion.” evt-0150. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.