The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
The committee addressed AI face swapping, voice imitation, manipulated materials, and unauthorised collection of performance data for training, calling for accountability for alleged infringers and platforms failing to review content adequately.
What changed
The committee addressed AI face swapping, voice imitation, manipulated materials, and unauthorised collection of performance data for training, calling for accountability for alleged infringers and platforms failing to review content adequately.
An industry organisation’s statement is not a regulatory order, legislation, or judicial decision; its legal formulations are recorded as claims.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: the industry organisation brings voiceprints, likenesses, source material, and training use into a shared rights debate.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
The committee addressed AI face swapping, voice imitation, manipulated materials, and unauthorised collection of performance data for training, calling for accountability for alleged infringers and platforms failing to review content adequately.
SRC-0134Lines 48–54: statement date, targets, and calls for accountability.
Beijing Daily app / Republication by Sina · ZH · 2026-04-02
Case
Related documents
DOC-0122Solemn statement by the Actors’ Committee of the China Federation of Radio and Television AssociationsCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Actors’ committee opposes unauthorised synthesis and training.” evt-0139. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.