Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
The union reiterated its opposition to replacing performers, criticized Sora 2’s copyright opt-out mechanism, welcomed the cameo feature’s approach to affirmative consent, and explained that collective agreements bind only signatory employers.
What changed
The union reiterated its opposition to replacing performers, criticized Sora 2’s copyright opt-out mechanism, welcomed the cameo feature’s approach to affirmative consent, and explained that collective agreements bind only signatory employers.
Records the union’s position at that time, not an independent review of current product features or legal effect.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: commercializing a synthetic character raised disputes over acting as a profession, consent, and the limits of collective agreements.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
The union reiterated its opposition to replacing performers, criticized Sora 2’s copyright opt-out mechanism, welcomed the cameo feature’s approach to affirmative consent, and explained that collective agreements bind only signatory employers.
SRC-0125Lines 23–65: Tilly, Sora 2, affirmative consent, and the scope of contractual obligations.
SAG-AFTRA · EN · 2025-10-09
Case
Related documents
DOC-0113A Message from President Sean Astin and NED Duncan Crabtree-Ireland Regarding A.I.Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Union revisits Tilly, Sora 2, and affirmative consent.” evt-0126. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.