Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Reporting names actors concerned about DINT’s AI-dubbing project, seeking the provenance of its training voice library and saying they did not authorise their recordings for AI training or replication.
What changed
Reporting names actors concerned about DINT’s AI-dubbing project, seeking the provenance of its training voice library and saying they did not authorise their recordings for AI training or replication.
The report recalls actions from late June to early July; this is its publication date. DINT’s use of these recordings has not been independently established, and there is no infringement ruling here.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: demands for training-data provenance confront corporate responses about permission and assistive uses.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
Reporting names actors concerned about DINT’s AI-dubbing project, seeking the provenance of its training voice library and saying they did not authorise their recordings for AI training or replication.
SRC-0095Actors’ demands, names and quoted DINT response; the original joint-statement image and Instagram posts have not been read
ANMTV / Albert Cardozo · ES · 2025-07-12
Case
Related documents
DOC-0083Chile: voice actors challenge DINT’s use of their voices in artificial intelligenceCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Media report Chilean voice actors’ request for DINT to explain permissions.” evt-0096. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.