The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Cara publishes an FAQ on its legal fund and scraping incidents. The current version read explains the fund’s uses and describes the platform as supporting artists rather than adopting an anti-AI label.
View full image ↗Source-page excerpt from “Scraping & Legal Fund Frequently Asked Questions”, captured on 1 October 2026. The original-language layout is retained; this is not a snapshot taken on the event date.
Source: Cara; rights remain with the original holders.
Source · Scraping & Legal Fund Frequently Asked Questions ↗What changed
Cara publishes an FAQ on its legal fund and scraping incidents. The current version read explains the fund’s uses and describes the platform as supporting artists rather than adopting an anti-AI label.
The current page includes retrospective updates after August 30; not all present wording can be assigned to August 27. Facts are the party’s account, and scraping counts differ within the text.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: study artist-built platforms, technical defences and legal fundraising as related actions with distinct effects.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
Cara publishes an FAQ on its legal fund and scraping incidents. The current version read explains the fund’s uses and describes the platform as supporting artists rather than adopting an anti-AI label.
SRC-0075Incident Timeline; “Does Cara identify as being anti-AI”; scope of the legal fund
Case
Related documents
DOC-0063Scraping & Legal Fund Frequently Asked QuestionsCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Cara publishes a legal-fund and scraping FAQ.” evt-0076. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.