The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Source metadata and links checked; this does not mean the original was saved.
View full image ↗Opening page of the source document associated with “UMG Recordings, Capitol Records and Capitol CMG v DistroKid — Complaint”. Original page layout retained; follow the source for the full text.
Image source: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware; copy hosted by Music Business Worldwide; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · UMG Recordings, Capitol Records and Capitol CMG v DistroKid — Complaint ↗Material description
Plaintiffs' allegations, not findings. First six pages and filing stamp checked; temporary intake number is not presented as the final civil docket number.
This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.
Sources & original material
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware; copy hosted by Music Business Worldwide · EN · 2026-09-15
Related events
UMG and affiliates sue DistroKid entities
UMG, Capitol Records and Capitol CMG allege deceptive distribution and copyright infringement involving mass AI content, identity and metadata accountability. The complaint distinguishes disclosed AI music use.
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “UMG Recordings, Capitol Records and Capitol CMG v DistroKid — Complaint.” doc-0409. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.