Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Source metadata and links checked; this does not mean the original was saved.
Material description
The association's own support statement. The cited 42% survey figure and summary of AI Act labelling obligations were not independently verified and are not included as legal findings.
This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.
Sources & original material
Related events
SFF publicly supports demands for visual creators' training permission and AI labelling
SFF supported Svenska Tecknare's demands for training-image permission, opt-out mechanisms, labelling of AI-generated content and protection of creative labour, emphasising human creation and fair remuneration.
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Calls for clearer AI rules for image creators.” doc-0216. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.