ANTI-AI ARCHIVE
CASES / CASE-U261001-02

Third Circuit affirms the ROSS copyright and fair-use ruling

The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

In case 25-2153, the Third Circuit affirmed the copyright and fair-use ruling concerning 2,243 Westlaw headnotes. The opinion records a filing date of 29 September 2026; the court’s public list records the case on 30 September. The dispute concerns protected summaries used for a competing legal-search system. The ROSS system at issue was not generative AI.

RELATED SOURCE IMAGE
First page of the Third Circuit opinion in the ROSS appeal, No. 25-2153, filed 29 September 2026.View full image ↗

First page of the Third Circuit opinion in the ROSS appeal, No. 25-2153, filed 29 September 2026.

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; official original document

Source · Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GMBH; West Publishing Corp v. Ross Intelligence Inc., No. 25-2153 ↗
Dates describe collected records, not the full life of the case.
RESEARCH NOTE

Reading scope: introduction, system description, the first and fourth fair-use factors, and conclusion of the 32-page opinion; not the complete litigation record. The filing and public-list dates are distinguished without inferring an exact unsealing time. This entry records the appellate ruling without claiming it is the first of its kind. Catalogued 1 October 2026; AI-assisted translation, independent human review pending.

Case chronology

Third Circuit affirms the ROSS copyright and fair-use ruling

In case 25-2153, the Third Circuit affirmed the copyright and fair-use ruling concerning 2,243 Westlaw headnotes. The opinion records a filing date of 29 September 2026; the court’s public list records the case on 30 September. The dispute concerns protected summaries used for a competing legal-search system. The ROSS system at issue was not generative AI.

United StatesPublishing / Public-governance contextEVT-U261001-02

Research question

Editorial interpretation: this case can be compared with music and visual-material licensing disputes to examine how training uses and potential licensing markets enter judicial reasoning. It is structural context in law and knowledge production, not an AI-artwork event or proof that artists have prevailed in every training dispute.

Related documents

DOC-U261001-02Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GMBH; West Publishing Corp v. Ross Intelligence Inc., No. 25-2153

Sources

SRC-U261001-02
Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GMBH; West Publishing Corp v. Ross Intelligence Inc., No. 25-2153

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · EN · 2026-09-29

SRC-U261001-05
Third Circuit precedential opinions public list: 30 September 2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · EN · 2026-09-30

Related cases

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Third Circuit affirms the ROSS copyright and fair-use ruling.” case-u261001-02. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.