The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
On 2 October 2023 NZSA posted the September statement of CLNZ, PANZ and NZSA, advocating training permission, remuneration, transparency, collective licensing and co-regulation.
This is sector advocacy, not enacted regulation or an executed licence. The Berne interpretation is the organizations’ position. The statement acknowledges Māori taonga and tikanga while deferring to more knowledgeable voices; no Māori mandate is inferred.
Case chronology
New Zealand creators and publishers joint AI statement
On 2 October 2023 NZSA posted the September statement of CLNZ, PANZ and NZSA, advocating training permission, remuneration, transparency, collective licensing and co-regulation.
Research question
Editorial interpretation: connects training uses of literary and visual works to collective licensing and regulatory power while recognizing AI benefits and cultural rights.
Related documents
DOC-0905Artificial Intelligence: Position Statement September 2023DOC-0906Artificial Intelligence: Position Statement September 2023Sources
New Zealand Society of Authors (NZSA) · EN · 2023-10-02
New Zealand Society of Authors (NZSA) · EN · Date unknown
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “New Zealand creators and publishers joint AI statement.” case-0270. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.