ANTI-AI ARCHIVESALON DES REFUSÉS
CASES / CASE-0210

Bartz v Anthropic: author-publisher settlement allocation

Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

The Guild urges publishers to relinquish long-out-of-print settlement claims to authors and compensate authors excluded by publishers' contractual registration failures. It says it lacked access to the downloaded-work dataset.

Dates describe collected records, not the full life of the case.
RESEARCH NOTE

These are advocacy demands, not a new court order or an automatic rule giving every author the whole award. Actual allocations and contractual ownership require separate verification.

Case chronology

Research question

Editorial interpretation: examines relationships between creative labour, permission and institutional responses in this record.

Related documents

DOC-0419Authors Guild Statement to Publishers on Anthropic Settlement: Relinquish Claims on Long Out of Print Books and Pay Out for Works You Failed to Register

Sources

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Bartz v Anthropic: author-publisher settlement allocation.” case-0210. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.