ANTI-AI ARCHIVE
CASES / CASE-0131

Chilevoces: explicit contract terms for voice use and AI cloning

The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.

RELATED SOURCE IMAGE
Image published with “Protecting our voice: an urgent call for specific contracts and clauses in the audiovisual industry”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.View full image ↗

Image published with “Protecting our voice: an urgent call for specific contracts and clauses in the audiovisual industry”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.

Image source: Chilevoces A.G.; rights remain with the original rights holders.

Source · Protecting our voice: an urgent call for specific contracts and clauses in the audiovisual industry ↗
Dates describe collected records, not the full life of the case.
RESEARCH NOTE

The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.

Case chronology

Research question

a voice workers' association asks that authorised uses, custody and destination be written into specific contracts, adding the direct voice of a Latin American creators' organisation.

Related documents

DOC-0205Protecting our voice: an urgent call for specific contracts and clauses in the audiovisual industryDOC-0339Chilevoces public statement on AI, synthetic voices and voice cloningDOC-0340Chilevoces rejects the AI provision in the major reform: “It is a very concrete threat”

Sources

Related cases

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Chilevoces: explicit contract terms for voice use and AI cloning.” case-0131. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.