The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
This case contains two dated events; see the timeline. Original documents, parties’ responses, and subsequent developments are still being collected.
View full image ↗Image published with “Join us today: #StealingIsntInnovation”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.
Image source: Authors Guild; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · Join us today: #StealingIsntInnovation ↗The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
Writers’ Guild of Ireland previews Stealing Isn’t Innovation
The Writers’ Guild of Ireland previews the cross-disciplinary campaign planned for January 22 and invites participation in its dissemination.
Authors Guild mobilises participation in Stealing Isn’t Innovation
Authors Guild issues a same-day call to participate, describing the Human Artistry Campaign’s multimedia effort against unauthorised use of works for AI training.
Research question
Treats newspapers, advertising, and social circulation as documentary objects of cross-disciplinary creator mobilization.
Related documents
DOC-0024Join us today: #StealingIsntInnovationDOC-0025Human Artistry Campaign: Stealing Isn’t InnovationSources
Writers’ Guild of Ireland · EN · 2026-01-21
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Stealing Isn’t Innovation / Cross-disciplinary campaign.” case-0023. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.